|
Score
|
|
|
6
|
Accurately identifies two or more claims from the reading selection and explains the
relationship of Figure 1 and 2 to these claims with accuracy, a high degree of
complexity, and insight. Examinees can demonstrate a high degree of complexity
or insight by successfully meeting the standards for a "5" AND by:
- introducing an additional claim and adequately discussing its relationship to
one of the figures; or
- explaining an additional aspect of a figure's relationship to a claim; or
- discussing the relationship between one or more figures and the reading using
perceptive analysis
|
|
5
|
Accurately identifies two or more claims from the reading selection and explains the
relationship of Figure 1 and Figure 2 to these claims with accuracy and a degree of
complexity. Examinees can demonstrate a degree of complexity by successfully
completing one of the following:
- introducing a third claim and adequately discussing its relationship to one of the
figures
- explaining an additional aspect of a figure's relationship to a claim
|
|
4
|
Accurately identifies two claims from the reading selection and adequately explains
the relationship of Figure 1 to one of these claims and Figure 2 to the other.
|
|
3
|
Accurately identifies two claims from the reading selection and adequately explains
the relationship of one claim to one figure, but the connection between the other
claim and a second figure is missing or inadequate (e.g., the connection is based on
a misreading of the figure or simply repeats the language of the claim).
|
|
2
|
Accurately identifies one claim from the reading selection and adequately
establishes a relationship between that claim and one or both of the figures.
|
|
1
|
Makes an attempt but does not accurately identify any of the claims or identifies one
or more claims without establishing an adequate connection to either of the figures.
|
|
0
|
Blank, completely off-topic, illegible, or written in a language other than English.
|
