|
A. Develops an essay that presents a focused response to the writing assignment, making appropriate and coherent connections among all parts of the assignment.
|
B. Demonstrates understanding of the reading through summary and explanation of relevant material.
|
C. Incorporates, as support for own thoughts, references to the readings, identifying the sources formally or informally
|
D. Communicates clearly and effectively using appropriate conventions of language (e.g., grammar, spelling, punctuation).
|
|
6 Addresses the writing assignment fully, analytically, and perhaps critically or imaginatively, with superior focus and coherence.
|
6 Demonstrates superior and perhaps critical understanding of readings through accurate summary, full explanation, and insightful analysis of relevant sections.
|
6 Makes insightful connections and distinctions between readings and own ideas; integrates references smoothly into own essay and identifies them consistently and correctly.
|
6 Communicates with precision and enhanced expression through highly effective use of vocabulary and sentence variety; infrequent, if any, lapses in use of conventions.
|
|
5 Addresses the writing assignment fully and analytically, with strong focus and coherence.
|
5 Demonstrates strong understanding of readings through accurate summary, with appropriate explanation and analysis of relevant sections.
|
5 Makes analytical connections and perhaps distinctions between readings and own ideas; integrates references into own essay and identifies then consistently and correctly.
|
5 Communicates effectively throughout the essay, with few lapses in use of conventions.
|
|
4 Addresses all parts of the writing assignment with adequate focus and coherence throughout.
|
4 Demonstrates overall understanding of readings through appropriate summary and explanation, with some analysis.
|
4 Makes and explains appropriate connections between readings and own ideas; identifies references consistently and correctly.
|
4 Communicates clearly throughout the essay; sentences may contain some lapses in use of conventions, but these rarely impede comprehension.
|
|
3 Addresses all or most parts of the writing assignment adequately, but focus may lapse briefly or connections may be missing.
|
3 Demonstrates generally accurate understanding of readings although summary or explanation may be incomplete or not fully relevant.
|
3 Makes some connections between readings and own ideas but they may not all be appropriate or adequately explained; identifies most references consistently and correctly.
|
3 Generally communicates clearly throughout the essay although lapses in use of conventions may at times impede comprehension or prove distracting.
|
|
2 Addresses some parts of the writing assignment or addresses all parts superficially; focus or coherence may break down at several points.
|
2 Demonstrates partial understanding of the readings through summary or explanation, but understanding is flawed or explanation is incomplete.
|
2 Makes few or unwarranted connections between readings and own ideas; may identify references inconsistently or incorrectly.
|
2 Communicates clearly at times, showing some ability to use conventions, but whole sections are unclear or errors frequently impede comprehension.
|
|
1 Shows little or no ability to address the writing assignment; may not link thoughts between paragraphs.
|
1 Demonstrates little or no understanding of text.
|
1 makes no reference to background reading or makes no distinctions between background reading and own ideas.
|
1 Communicates little because few sentences demonstrate appropriate use of conventions.
|